Connect with us

1000 125

Sabalenka voices concern as US Open confronts dual controversy

Sabalenka and Gauff speak on US Open problems as controversy grows around the event.

Published

on

[The 2026 US Open is dealing with a growing credibility problem in the middle of the tournament, and world No 1 Aryna Sabalenka has become the latest leading player to raise her voice on an issue that appears difficult to fix.

During her third-round match against Kamila Rakhimova, Sabalenka paused play in Louis Armstrong Stadium to complain to the umpire about the smell of weed. Her decision to stop the match underscored a concern that British No 1 Katie Boulter had already mentioned earlier in the event.

“Someone is smoking weed,” Sabalenka told the umpire. “Would you mind to (tell them to deal with it) because it’s so strong?”

She returned to the subject after the match and made her position clear in the press conference.

Advertisement

“Guys, you can relax any way you want and you can smoke anything you want, but please don’t do it around the tennis court.

“It’s a bit tricky to handle that smell while you are trying to perform at your best. There is nothing else to say about weed. I’m just asking people not to smoke it around the tennis court.”

The issue has now been acknowledged by several players, leaving USTA officials with a problem that is proving awkward to solve. Yet another storyline, of their own making, has also begun to dominate the conversation.

Tournament organisers have brought in influencers to help promote the event, and their presence has quickly become one of the biggest talking points. Matches have been interrupted while social media creators film videos and promote products during points, with Naomi Osaka left unimpressed.

Advertisement

Coco Gauff took a more measured view, but she was still firm that tennis etiquette must be respected.

“I think it’s great to have a different demographic to the sport, and I think I have no problem with influencers,” said Gauff.

“I have met some of them and follow some of them online. Luckily, the ones I do follow online do follow the etiquette and know tennis pretty well.

“I think it’s like any venue you come to, you have to follow the etiquette towards it. I think it may be on some of the brands, too, maybe to have, like, a sign plastered or something in the suites so that they know. Because, you know, sometimes it’s their first tennis match. They don’t know. They have probably been to basketball games before.

Advertisement

“But I definitely think no flash photography, because that does bother [us], and I am one of the more lenient players. There is very few times you hear me complain about noise. The flash (light)… definitely no flash in the points and try not to talk too loud.

“But like with anything, any venue you go to, like if you’re being invited to a red carpet, you wouldn’t show up in jeans. I think it’s just, follow the etiquette of the sport. That’s all.”

Unless the USTA changes course and stops giving these guests tickets in seats that are worth thousands of dollars, the debate is unlikely to fade. With Instagram and TikTok overflowing with images of influencers promoting themselves and their brands, the question remains whether tennis is actually gaining new fans. For now, the tournament’s news cycle is being shaped by problems that are damaging its image.

Advertisement

1000

Alex Eala opens Singapore challenge against Prozorova as ranking gains loom

Eala begins in Singapore against Prozorova, with ranking gains and a clearer draw within reach.

Published

on

Alex Eala will start her Singapore Open run against Tatiana Prozorova in the second round, with her first match since a tense three-set defeat to Iva Jovic in the third round of the US Open on 6 September.

On paper, the route to the WTA 500 final has become slightly less demanding. Eighth seed Donna Vekic fell in the opening round, while second seed Amanda Anisimova withdrew at the last moment because of a wrist injury. Eala had been projected to meet the American, who beat her in three sets in Cincinnati last month, in the semi-finals. If Eala goes all the way to the final, the only seed she can potentially face before that stage is seventh seed Maria Sakkari.

Interest in her return is growing, especially from supporters who will have the chance to follow her much closer to home. Tournament director Yazed Osman has welcomed that attention and was clear about Eala’s wider appeal.

She said, “The Eala story is not only unique to the Philippines, but also with the tennis fraternity globally. She played her first few games here in the WTA during the WTA Finals. We have the Future Stars program, and she won that tournament when she was 12 years old. And the family shared that they remembered the OCBC Arena, and the courts where she stayed and so on.

Advertisement

“And then last year she also featured in the Singapore Tennis Open 250, and now this 500. So her journey itself has been an inspiration to the tennis community, and I think the region is actually coming here and feeling very excited to see her perform at the highest level.”

According to the tournament website, Eala will face world No 180 Prozorova on Thursday, 24 September. She is scheduled as the fourth match on Centre Court, with the round-of-16 meeting set for no earlier than 6.30pm local time, 11.30am GMT/BST.

Eala will be on court after Joanna Garland meets Xin Wang and before Sakkari faces Nao Hibino.

A win would move her ahead of Naomi Osaka to 17th in the rankings, while lifting the title would take her to a career-high 14. With many rivals absent from WTA Tour action this week, the Singapore event offers Eala a clear chance to improve her position before the Asian Cup.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

1000

Anisimova exits Singapore Open as WTA schedule pressure builds

Anisimova withdraws from Singapore Open and now faces WTA schedule and ranking pressure.

Published

on

Amanda Anisimova has pulled out of the Singapore Open just before she was due to play her opening match. The American was scheduled to face Talia Gibson in the round of 16 at the WTA 500 event, but a left wrist injury has forced her to withdraw.

Her place in the draw has gone to lucky loser Viktoria Morvayova, who moves directly into the second round of the WTA Tour Asian tournament.

The immediate concern is the injury, but the withdrawal also leaves Anisimova facing possible consequences tied to her 2026 schedule. She has played a relatively light season so far, appearing in only 12 tournaments. Within that total, she has featured in just two WTA 500 events, one short of the mandatory three every female player is required to complete across the season.

She has played only the Brisbane International and Queen’s before Singapore this year, meaning the Singapore Open would have been her third tournament of that level. Now, with the event out of reach, she risks a fine if she does not add another WTA 500 appearance before the year ends.

Advertisement

There are only two tournaments left after Singapore, the Ningbo Open and the Pan Pacific Open, both set for October during the WTA Tour’s Asian swing. Anisimova has never played either event, so neither has been an obvious priority in her career. In 2026, though, one of them may become necessary.

If she skips both, she could face a point deduction or a monetary fine. That possibility sits alongside her hopes of reaching the WTA Finals, where she still has an outside chance of qualifying. She is currently 21st in the live Race for the WTA Finals standings, well outside the top eight spots that secure entry.

That leaves her with a decision that may shape the rest of her season. She could choose to play both WTA 500 tournaments in search of ranking points, while also trying to avoid any sanction. She will also be aiming to keep her WTA Finals hopes alive, especially with the event taking place on home soil at Indian Wells for the first time.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

1000

Eala’s Asian Games decision puts WTA rule debate in focus

Eala’s Asian Games choice has triggered a possible WTA fine and strong criticism from former players.

Published

on

Alex Eala’s choice to compete at the 2026 Asian Games has sparked debate because it conflicts with the penultimate Masters event on the WTA calendar. Her decision means she will miss the China Open while trying to deliver gold for the Philippines.

Under WTA rules, players are expected to contest every Masters event unless they are injured, so Eala could face a fine from the governing body. She requested an exemption, but that appeal was turned down, leaving open the possibility of a sanction for one of the tour’s most followed players.

That prospect has drawn strong criticism from Steve Johnson, John Isner, and Sam Querrey, who argued that punishing Eala would be a mistake. “1000% she should play [the Asian Games], said Johnson on Nothing Major. “If the WTA fine her, that is the dumbest thing that they could do. Do not fine her.

“I know that they have not made exceptions in the past for certain players, but there is different rules for everyone. I hate to say it, but there just is.”

Advertisement

Isner added: “I’m with you. They should waive the fine. Her ranking is going to dip by virtue of not playing.”

Querrey was equally direct.

“They also need stars and she is one of the biggest,” he explained. “They have a lot of leverage going into an individual sport. If she goes ‘if you guys fine me, I will skip more tournaments’.

“Let’s see how it goes [if she says] I will skip the other tournaments in Asia, where she is going to be the biggest star.”

Advertisement

The issue is complicated further by the fact that several leading Chinese players, including Wang Xinyu, have chosen the China Open over the Asian Games.

Still, Eala has become one of the WTA Tour’s biggest draws in 2026. She has filled stadiums at the Australian Open and during the Middle Eastern swing, where long queues formed outside venues for her matches. She also stood out on the North American hardcourt swing, capped by her first WTA Tour title at the Washington Open.

Against that backdrop, many will see a fine as a poor decision, especially if it risks alienating a player whose matches continue to attract large crowds and strong support.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending