Connect with us

ATP Tour News

Alcaraz and Sabalenka push back on packed tennis calendar at US Open

Alcaraz and Sabalenka question the tennis calendar, while Roger Rasheed pushes back on complaints.

Published

on

The conversation over tennis’s demanding calendar has surfaced again at the US Open, with Carlos Alcaraz and Aryna Sabalenka both voicing concerns about the workload players face.

Alcaraz is contesting his first event in four and a half months in New York, and the Spaniard said he plans to be more selective with his schedule moving forward. He made clear that time away from competition matters to him, not only for recovery, but also for preparation and motivation.

“I want to have the breaks that I need to prepare the tournaments, to have the time to prepare the tournaments, to miss the tennis, to miss the tour, to miss you guys,” said the Spaniard. “I think that’s really important.”

Sabalenka backed that view and went further, arguing that the sport should reconsider the number of compulsory events on the calendar. Players are currently required to play all nine Masters events, along with three 500 tournaments of their choosing.

Advertisement

“I would love to see changes to the calendar and eliminate the mandatory events to let the players decide what’s best for their health,” said the world No 1.

“It’s been incredibly intense. Especially if you play at the level Carlos plays, which is basically very consistent, it’s very hard on the body.

“If they’re not going to reduce it, we’ll have to sacrifice points, ranking position, whatever it takes, to protect our bodies. I think it would be really helpful for the WTA and ATP to relax the calendar a bit for us in order to truly support our health.”

Roger Rasheed, who has coached the likes of Lleyton Hewitt and Gael Monfils, has not been sympathetic to the complaints. Speaking with Mark Petchey on X, he questioned the claim that there are too many matches, suggesting that those competing regularly are usually enjoying strong seasons.

Advertisement

“The too many matches is the one for me, only a very small minority could claim that and if you are playing lots, well you’re obviously having a bloody good year – wasn’t that the initial goal?” he said.

Rasheed later proposed that leading players should put forward a mock calendar that they believe would work from top to bottom.

“With players complaining about the schedule and the calendar, I would suggest that they come up with and present a mock calendar which they all believe works from top to bottom,” he said.

“The debate is unlikely to fade soon, and there is still no sign that the current demands will be reduced.

Advertisement

ATP Tour ATP Tour News

Rusedski points to Alcaraz’s busy schedule in wrist injury discussion

Rusedski links Alcaraz’s wrist injury to overplaying and says the schedule needs balance.

Published

on

Greg Rusedski has suggested that Carlos Alcaraz’s wrist problem may have been the result of overloading his schedule, and he said exhibition appearances did not help.

Alcaraz was riding high after becoming the youngest man to complete the career Grand Slam when he won the Australian Open at 22. For a time, he appeared to be pulling clear of the rest of the ATP Tour, including Jannik Sinner. But Sinner responded by winning the Sunshine Double and then beating Alcaraz in the Monte Carlo Masters final.

A wrist injury then emerged in mid-April and kept Alcaraz out for more than four months. The 23-year-old has returned strongly at the US Open, yet he has already indicated that he wants to build more rest into his future planning.

Alcaraz told reporters this week, “ In the future, I’m going to take some breaks. Maybe not four months, but one month, two months, missing some tournaments, because it’s impossible to play them all.”

Advertisement

Rusedski, a former US Open finalist, believes the issue is about balance and said he thinks Alcaraz and his former coach Juan Carlos Ferrero may have disagreed over the value of exhibition events. On Off Court, he said, “Well, I think a certain coach by the name of Juan Carlos Ferrero was talking about stop chasing the money at the exhibitions, let’s get a proper schedule, let’s figure out how we’re going to work this financially between the two of us, and he’s finally figured it out.

“Why did he [Alcaraz] get injured? He overplayed. It’s as simple as that. You cannot play every exhibition during the off season, expect to be fit and not break down. It’s humanly not possible, no matter how great you are.”

Ferrero had previously defended Alcaraz’s decision to play exhibitions ahead of his match against Frances Tiafoe in Puerto Rico in February 2025, saying, “They allow you to relax a little, they are played in a different way. But there’s a certain level of intensity and demand. Playing this type of match with a smile, putting on a show for the fans, it always helps to relax a bit.”

Rusedski also noted that Alcaraz played the second-most matches behind Alexander Zverev in 2025, while also appearing in the ‘Netflix Slam’ with Rafael Nadal in 2024, the Six Kings Slam in the past two years, and with Joao Fonseca in Miami in 2025.

Advertisement

He concluded that Alcaraz will need to manage his body more carefully going forward and accept that every exhibition cannot be part of the calendar.

Continue Reading

ATP Tour News Grand Slam

Ljubicic says tennis is stuck in a no-win debate over US Open scheduling

Ljubicic says tennis faces criticism either way as US Open late-night finishes fuel more debate.

Published

on

Former world No. 3 Ivan Ljubicic has stepped into the growing dispute around tennis scheduling, arguing that the sport is facing criticism no matter what it does.

The debate has intensified in 2026 as players continue to speak out about a tour that many feel has become too physical and too long. That has fed renewed demands for calendar reform, while injuries to Carlos Alcaraz, Jannik Sinner and Jack Draper have also sharpened concerns over the demands placed on the game’s leading figures. Questions around the quality of tennis balls have been part of that wider discussion.

At the US Open, late-night finishes have drawn particular attention. Venus Williams did not begin her first-round match until after midnight, while Alexander Zverev has had back-to-back finishes in the early hours of the morning. Greg Rusedski has also called for weed to be banned from Flushing Meadows after Aryna Sabalenka’s latest complaints.

Against that backdrop, former British player Mark Petchey argued that the sport’s wider momentum should not be ignored, saying tennis is “ exploding in popularity” and that more should be done to celebrate the “hardest sport in the world”.

Advertisement

Ljubicic, who was Roger Federer’s former coach, responded after Christopher Clarey highlighted a run of late finishes at the US Open. He tweeted, “THREE nights past 2 a.m., not the kind of record you want to be setting. Is there not a much better way for the health and well-being of everyone involved in the tournament?”

He later added, “Well we have @rolandgarros scheduling one night session match – controversial? @Wimbledon with 11pm curfew… Controversial?… Seems like whatever our sport does is controversial…”

The response to Clarey’s post was mixed, but many agreed with Ljubicic’s view. Whether the tournament makes changes now or later remains unclear, yet the issue has again placed tennis under scrutiny at one of its biggest events.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

ATP Tour ATP Tour News

Alcaraz powers through US Open opening week after injury layoff

Alcaraz is through the US Open first week in control, and now faces Tommy Paul next.

Published

on

Carlos Alcaraz has moved through the opening stages of the US Open with the kind of control that has made him the player to beat.

After not competing since April, the Spaniard has returned to action in New York and taken care of Roman Safiullin, Jaime Faria, and Wu Yibing to reach the fourth round. He has lost only one set across those three matches, and even with a serve that still appears below his best, he has looked composed, sharp, and increasingly convincing.

His next assignment is against Tommy Paul on Sunday, 6th September, with the order of play still to be confirmed. Even so, the match is expected to be on Arthur Ashe Stadium. It is shaping up as his most demanding test so far, and the level of opposition does not get lighter from there, with Ben Shelton and Frances Tiafoe among the names waiting in the next phase of the event.

For all that, the opening week has largely unfolded in Alcaraz’s favor. While he has advanced with relative ease, several of his rivals have already exited. Novak Djokovic, Felix Auger-Aliassime, Alex de Minaur, and Arthur Fils were all beaten in the first week, while Alexander Zverev, the top seed, has been pushed to five sets in both of his opening matches against Lorenzo Sonego and Quentin Halys, with both contests stretching into the early hours.

Advertisement

There had even been doubt in some quarters about whether Alcaraz would take part in singles at all, despite his mixed doubles debut alongside Serena Williams. Marion Bartoli addressed that speculation on Sky Sports Tennis after that defeat, saying: “When he played the mixed doubles with Serena, and they lost the second match, the rumours going around with different coaches was that he was not going to take to the court in singles,” said the Frenchwoman.

She added: “That was the rumour going into the players’ area. But he is through the first week and breezing through it. He has done the job perfectly. He has been on point with the mentality as well. He was fist-pumping a lot, having a lot of energy. You can see it is a joy to be out there.”

Continue Reading

Trending