Connect with us

Finals Governing Bodies Grand Slam

Evonne Goolagong’s long-lost weeks at world No. 1 recovered

Goolagong’s 1976 rise to world No.1 was uncovered in 2009 when WTA records were reviewed on April 26

Published

on

On April 26, 1976, Evonne Goolagong reached the top of the WTA rankings after winning the Virginia Slims Championships, the event now known as the WTA Finals. That ascent went unrecognized in real time and remained hidden until 2009 when the WTA discovered several paper records missing from its rankings archive.

The rankings in 1976 were calculated every two weeks, and the revised archive showed Goolagong had overtaken Chris Evert for the top spot for two weeks from April 26 to May 9, 1976. At the time the WTA rankings had only been in place for five months, having been introduced in November 1975, and the omission was attributed to imperfect record-keeping in the sport’s early administrative days.

“I’m very proud of the achievement,” Goolagong told the Associated Press in 2009. “I was on a roll for that stretch in 1976. It was a great surprise to hear after all these years.”

The discovery changed how Goolagong’s ranking history is viewed. Although she was the 16th player ever to be announced as No. 1 on the WTA rankings, the corrected record shows she was actually the second woman ever to hold the position, after Evert. The WTA presented Goolagong with a No. 1 trophy in 2009, 31 years after her rise and 26 years after she retired from the tour.

Advertisement

“Unfortunately our record-keeping wasn’t perfect in those early days of women’s tennis and our ranking system was viewed as a means of just accepting tournament entries,” then-WTA CEO Larry Scott said at the time. “It wasn’t until the early 1980s that the media and players started to pay attention to the changes in the rankings during the year as opposed to only the end-of-season rankings.”

Goolagong’s corrected place in history sits alongside an already remarkable resume: seven Grand Slam singles titles, including four Australian Opens (1974, 1975, 1976 and 1977), Roland Garros in 1971, and Wimbledon in 1971 and 1980. She won the December 1977 Australian Open and Wimbledon in 1980 as a mother, one of three women in the Open Era to do so alongside Margaret Court and Kim Clijsters, and the only mother to win Wimbledon in that era.

Finals French Open Grand Slam

Siniakova, Townsend secure Roland Garros title and chase team Career Grand Slam

Siniakova and Townsend captured Roland Garros, their third different major, and target a Career Slam.

Published

on

Top seeds Katerina Siniakova and Taylor Townsend returned to Grand Slam victory with a straight-sets win at Roland Garros, beating second-seeded Anna Danilina and Aleksandra Krunic 6-2, 7-5. After falling behind 4-1 in the second set, the top seeds rallied to claim the clay-court major and register their third different major trophy together.

The Paris title follows their triumphs at 2024 Wimbledon and the 2025 Australian Open, leaving the pair with an opportunity to complete a team Career Grand Slam in New York later this year. Townsend reflected on what the American major would mean, saying, “For me the US Open would mean everything for me to be able to win that. I’ve gotten close several times as well. Lost to (Katerina) the first time,” Townsend smiled when speaking to press.

Siniakova was emotional after the victory as the duo collected their seventh team title. For the Czech, who already has a Career Golden Slam with Barbora Krejcikova, this marked her 11th Grand Slam crown in women’s doubles. Four of those titles have come at the clay-court major with three different partners.

Speaking about their partnership, Siniakova said, “The game of me and Taylor is totally different. I think for the opponents it’s also really tricky, because we can change it, and we can play almost anything we want. We can just do it during the game. I’m just really glad that we kind of work on everything and play anything, because then it’s also making it easier for us.”

Advertisement

The pair have been in strong form across the spring, winning four of the last five events they contested, with earlier titles at Indian Wells, Miami and Madrid. For Townsend, time away from her five-year-old son Adyn is a challenge she willingly accepts. “Of course, winning a title in a Grand Slam, it’s amazing. My dad, he was like, ‘I taped the ceremony, so I’ll show it when he wakes up.’ For (Adyn) to be able to see me succeeding, it means a lot to me, but also to be able to bring back lessons and things that I’ve learned and to come back a better person really drives and motivates me a lot,” Townsend said.

Continue Reading

Finals French Open Grand Slam

Mirra Andreeva wins first Grand Slam, defeats Maja Chwalinska in Paris final

Mirra Andreeva, 19, won her first Grand Slam at Roland Garros, beating Maja Chwalinska 6-3 6-2. (RG)

Published

on

Mirra Andreeva closed a remarkable fortnight at Roland Garros by defeating Maja Chwalinska 6-3, 6-2 to claim her first Grand Slam title.

The 19-year-old lifted the Coupe Suzanne Lenglen and became the first teenager to win the French Open since 2020, when Iga Swiatek prevailed at 19. Because Andreeva is the younger of the two 19-year-olds, she is the youngest woman to win Roland Garros since 1992. That year an 18-year-old Monica Seles took the title in Paris, the third of three consecutive French Open victories for Seles after wins in 1990 and 1991 at ages 16 and 17.

Andreeva’s straight-sets victory ended the extraordinary run of qualifier Maja Chwalinska, who had rewritten the tournament’s history en route to the final. Chwalinska became the first qualifier, female or male, to reach the Roland Garros final in the Open Era. Ranked No. 114 in the WTA standings, she also became the lowest-ranked player to reach the title match on the terre battue in WTA rankings history.

The final scoreline reflected Andreeva’s control through the match, and the result marks a major milestone in her career with a first Grand Slam crown. The victory places her in a select group of teenagers who have won at Roland Garros and revives historical comparisons because of her age relative to past champions.

Advertisement

Chwalinska’s run, from the qualifying draw to the championship match, was an unprecedented breakthrough for a player outside the top 100 and will be noted in the record books alongside the tournament’s longstanding traditions. Andreeva’s win adds a new chapter to Roland Garros history and confirms a changing landscape among the game’s youngest champions.

Continue Reading

Finals French Open Grand Slam

Unexpected Roland Garros final pits Mirra Andreeva against qualifier Maja Chwalinska

Mirra Andreeva faces qualifier Maja Chwalinska in an unexpected final; tactics and nerves decide now

Published

on

The women’s final at Roland Garros arrives without any of the four players many expected to contend. The tournament’s top four — Aryna Sabalenka, Elena Rybakina, Iga Swiatek and Coco Gauff — did not reach the semifinals, leaving room for two first-time major finalists to meet.

Mirra Andreeva arrived as a dark horse. At 19 she has long been a mix of talent and volatility: capable of sublime form but not yet proven across a full Grand Slam run. In Paris she has found a new level. Since the fourth round Andreeva has leaned on a powerful serve and extended groundstrokes, combining pace, depth, spin and net clearance to construct a near-impenetrable baseline position. In her last two matches she steamrolled Sorana Cirstea and Marta Kostyuk, arriving in the title match in dominant form.

Across the net stands Maja Chwalinska, a qualifier ranked 114th who until this run was scarcely on many radars. The 24-year-old, 5-foot-5, with a loopy, underpowered serve, took attention after beating Zheng Qinwen and Elise Mertens by identical 6-4, 6-0 scores. She has also been noted for a moment earlier in the season when she placed an ice bag on Iga Swiatek’s head. Chwalinska admitted the run has been a surprise. “It’s definitely a big surprise for me, and I didn’t expect it,” she said after reaching the quarterfinals. Reflecting on her semifinal, she added, “I honestly don’t know what was going on in my head,” and described her reaction as shock.

The matchup will be a first meeting and the first major final for both players. They share baseline instincts, two-handed backhands and a reliance on topspin, but their methods diverge. Andreeva presses with relentless power and consistency; Chwalinska relies on variation — high loopy balls, side-spinning slice, sudden backhand drops and precise passing shots — to create openings. Andreeva acknowledged the novelty: “It’s going to be very entertaining, very interesting, as well, because obviously I have never played against her.”

Advertisement

Two questions loom: will nerves influence either player on Chatrier, and can Chwalinska’s loops and chops and drops disrupt Andreeva’s current groove? The answers will determine who lifts the unexpected trophy.

Continue Reading

Trending