Connect with us

ATP Australian Open Grand Slam

Medvedev keeps perspective after reset at the Australian Open

Medvedev, unbeaten through six matches at the Australian Open, says he tries to stay positive 2026

Published

on

Daniil Medvedev has adopted a forward-looking stance as the Australian Open progresses. The former world No. 1 and 2021 US Open champion has not dwelled on a difficult 2025 season, instead focusing on a promising start to 2026.

Already a champion at the Brisbane International, the No. 11 seed arrives in Melbourne unbeaten through six matches. He defeated Jesper de Jong in three sets to reach the second round of a Grand Slam tournament for only the second time in his last five outings.

Between matches and media sessions, Medvedev still projects two familiar sides: a player who can display visible frustration during play and one who is calmer and more measured off court. Those contrasts have not translated into long-term worry for him about his level.

Medvedev credited work in the offseason and changes around him for his current state. He described a lengthy preseason and the influence of a new team while reflecting on the previous year, saying he finished the year “like 12 or 13, which is, to be honest, it’s great for many players.” He also acknowledged the disappointment of missing Turin for the first time “maybe after 7 or 8 years,” while noting that the “end of the year was better than the year itself.”

Advertisement

When asked about optimism and how he separates on-court frustration from his off-court outlook, he responded at length:

Q. Going back to last year, I feel like when things are maybe not going as well for you, you would maybe be frustrated on the court, but you would come to press and maybe not seem as concerned with where things were going. I feel like now, looking back, things are going well, were you more concerned than you were letting on? How do you find that sort of optimism?

DANIIL MEDVEDEV: It’s a tough question, for sure. In general, outside of the court, I try to be more optimistic than when I am on the court. That’s just the way I am, the way a lot of tennis players are.

It’s just that they show their frustrations differently. A lot of tennis players are negative on the court. Like you miss a forehand, Oh, my God, my forehand is not going well. Yeah, man, but you’re up 6-3, 5-3.

Advertisement

That’s me, as well. Again, I had a long preseason. Last year was tough. I’m feeling great with my new team, so I don’t really go too much into the past. What happened last year happened, and it’s okay. It’s part of career, part of life. I managed to finish the year like 12 or 13, which is, to be honest, it’s great for many players.

Of course I was not happy. It was first year I was not in Turin maybe after 7 or 8 years. It was still not that bad, and end of the year was better than the year itself.

I made a big push to try to be more positive on the court. So far I’m doing it well, but I’m never the guy to say, okay, now, not anymore. We don’t know what’s coming, but just trying to be positive on the court as I am in life, actually.

Advertisement

ATP Masters Miami Open

The Big T Episode 13: Golden Glizzy, Swiatek’s split, Fonseca’s tests and Jovic’s climb

Episode 13 of The Big T examines Miami highlights: Golden Glizzy, Swiatek split, Fonseca and Jovic..

Published

on

Episode 13 of The Big T podcast turned its attention to a wide range of Miami Open talk, from an extravagant concession item to shifts in the top ranks and the progress of emerging players.

First, the culinary curiosity. For $100, fans could buy an Australian Wagyu sausage topped with crème fraîche, Golden Goat Caviar and edible gold flakes, a creation dubbed the Golden Glizzy. Hosts Andrea Petkovic and Mark Petchey weighed in on the dish and the tournament atmosphere in the episode.

On the women’s side, the conversation focused on Iga Swiatek. Less than a year after claiming her first Wimbledon title with a 6-0, 6-0 final, Swiatek has split with coach Wim Fissette. The six-time Grand Slam champion is 13-9 in her last 22 matches and has not reached a semifinal since last September in Seoul. Her opening-round loss to compatriot Magda Linette in Miami appeared to prompt the change.

Petkovic reflected on that decision in the episode: “Sometimes, I’m connected to witchcraft,” she began, “because I predicted last year that Iga was going to win Wimbledon … and last year I was on a show in Germany, and they asked me to give my hottest take about tennis. And I said I think Wim Fissette and Iga Swiatek will not make it through Indian Wells-Miami.

Advertisement

“It was just an intuition that came upon me.”

Joao Fonseca’s two straight-set losses to Jannik Sinner (7-6, 7-6 at Indian Wells) and Carlos Alcaraz (6-4, 6-4 in Miami) were framed as valuable tests for the 19-year-old. Petkovic said, “That is the ideal scenario for a young guy like him,” Petkovic says of the 19-year-old. “He can now go back home, look at the tape of the matches and say, this is where they are still better, or this is what I still need to work on—and come on the clay and absolutely crush.”

Petchey added context and a note of caution: “This was a great learning curve, for him to play those two stars,” Petchey agreed. He also warned Fonseca’s many fanatics with another comment: “I still feel as though we need to temper our enthusiasm, of how quickly he may be in the world’s Top 10, and really in amongst it against Carlos and Jannik. I think it’s going to take 18 months to two years before he’s comfortably feeling—particularly in a best-of-five—that he’s got a realistic shot of winning.”

The episode also highlighted 18-year-old Iva Jovic, who rose from No. 191 at the 2025 Australian Open by winning the USTA Wild Card Playoff and later reached the Australian Open quarterfinals, moving into the Top 20. Jovic said simply, “I love talking, in general,” says another teenage tennis sensation, Iva Jovic. She reflected on travel and growth: “I’ve done a lot of great training, and played some tough matches after Australia, but I think I learned a lot from it. I’m happy with where I’m at.” She added a candid note about life off court: “I’m a little bit clumsy, and all over the place outside of the court,” she admitted. “I lose everything, that’s my thing—I can’t keep track of my things. I oversleep sometimes, I’ve overslept on match days!

Advertisement

“Hopefully one day, I can be as responsible and mature as I sound.”

Episode 13 is available on major streaming platforms for listeners who want the full discussion and extra segments.

Continue Reading

ATP Grand Slam Wimbledon

Wimbledon to introduce video review on six courts for 2026

Wimbledon will introduce video review on six courts in 2026 and add visual out and fault signs. Also

Published

on

The All England Club confirmed that video review will be available on six courts at Wimbledon in 2026. The announcement came on Saturday during a media briefing 100 days from the start of the event.

Review capability will be installed on Centre Court, No. 1 Court and four additional show courts: No. 2 Court, No. 3 Court, Court 12 and Court 18. Players will have unlimited opportunities to challenge specific chair-umpire decisions. The system will allow reviews of whether a ball bounced touched, whether a player touched the net, and other rulings either on a point-ending call when a player immediately stops play, or immediately after the completion of a point in the case of hindrance.

Video review is distinct from electronic line-calling, which Wimbledon adopted in 2025 to replace line umpires. That change proved controversial at times; the tournament later blamed “operator error” when a ball hit well long by Brit Sonay Kartal was not called against Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, and another point required a replay because of a system failure during a quarterfinal match between Taylor Fritz and Karen Khachanov.

The technology first appeared at a Grand Slam at the 2023 US Open and was used at the Australian Open in 2025. The ATP Tour rolled out video review at all Masters 1000 events last year after deploying it at the NextGen ATP Finals since 2018 and at the year-end ATP Finals since 2020.

Advertisement

In addition to introducing video review on six courts, Wimbledon will add a visual indication on scoreboards when a ball is out or a serve is a fault, supplementing the audible call.

Continue Reading

1000 ATP Miami Open

Miami Open Preview: Pegula vs. Rybakina and two close quarterfinal tests

Pegula and Rybakina meet again in Miami; we also assess Paul-Fils and Lehecka-Landaluce. Read picks!

Published

on

The Miami Open brings another chapter in the recent rivalry between Elena Rybakina and Jessica Pegula. The pair have met at the Billie Jean King Cup, the WTA Finals, the Australian Open, Indian Wells and now Miami, with Rybakina holding a 4-0 edge in those meetings. Pegula has challenged her, taking sets and pushing tiebreaks, but Rybakina’s serve and court craft have remained decisive.

Both women arrive in Miami unbeaten in three matches and comfortable on the courts. Rybakina reached the final here in 2023 and 2024; Pegula made the final in 2025. One variable that could matter is the start time: the match is scheduled for 1:00 P.M., when conditions are expected to be warmer and quicker. Pegula prefers quick conditions and has not had them in recent meetings with Rybakina, which came at night in Melbourne and on the slower Indian Wells courts. That switch could help the American and add a few miles per hour to her game. Winner: Pegula

The bottom half of the ATP draw has produced intriguing quarterfinals. Martin Landaluce, a 20-year-old product of the Rafa Nadal Academy and the 2022 US Open boys champion, has been one of Miami’s breakthrough players. Counting qualifiers, he has won six matches here, three in three sets, and in his last match he recovered from a 6-2 first-set deficit to beat Sebastian Korda and saved a match point en route.

Landaluce meets Jiri Lehecka for the first time. Both play with efficient, easy power; Landaluce has momentum, while Lehecka, the 22nd-ranked veteran, has just beaten Taylor Fritz in his best match of the season. Fuel and composure are the deciding factors. Winner: Lehecka

Advertisement

Tommy Paul and Arthur Fils present another difficult call. The players are close in the rankings, with Paul 23rd and Fils 31st. Both are athletic, strike the ball well and have shown solid form this season — Paul at 14-6 and Fils 12-4 as he returns from a lengthy layoff. In Miami each survived at least one three-set match. Paul will have a home crowd and the evening conditions, while Fils is still rebuilding his rhythm. This one is a coin flip.

Continue Reading

Trending