Connect with us

ATP BNP Paribas Open Masters

Medvedev criticizes Fergus Murphy’s rapid shot-clock starts amid time-violation debate

Medvedev joined Fritz and Alcaraz in criticizing Fergus Murphy’s quick starts of the shot clock…..

Published

on

Daniil Medvedev added his voice to growing concern over how chair umpires start the shot-clock, saying Fergus Murphy has been especially quick to begin the countdown. Medvedev raised the issue after reaching the BNP Paribas Open quarterfinal on Wednesday and echoed criticisms voiced earlier by Taylor Fritz and others.

The debate reignited following a time violation called on Carlos Alcaraz at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open. Alcaraz reacted immediately after a long rally with Karen Khachanov, asking, “I’m not allowed to go to the towel?” The shot-clock is intended to limit players to 25 seconds between points, but the chair umpire decides precisely when the clock starts once a point ends. Marija Cicak drew Alcaraz’s ire in Doha, while Fritz and Medvedev singled out Ferguson Murphy for starting the clock particularly quickly.

“I always had an issue with specifically Fergus starting the clock super fast,” Fritz said earlier in the week. “And I’d never got called for time violations and no one ever got called for time violations against me, but then there was probably 10 in total in my matches when he was in the chair, and then it started just being automatic, like when the point ends, it just starts. It’s not really up to the umpire.”

Medvedev addressed the matter directly in his on-court comments:

Advertisement

Q. Do you think some umpires [use the shot clock] differently to others?

DANIIL MEDVEDEV: Yeah, I think so. I think Fergus gave me two or three times in my life a time violation and I always went nuts.

Because sometimes you play Rafa, you play, I don’t know, Sascha takes, Novak takes some time to prepare for serve. And of course you play them sometimes with a different umpire. But I would love to see Fergus — I cannot play Rafa anymore, but if he would make, like, 10 times time violation to Rafa, because you need to have some common sense sometimes, which maybe you should.

I think also what would work great is to advertise a player, meaning, you know, not give only me, everyone, you first advertise, meaning on the changeover, you say, look, there was one or two times you were getting really close, next time it’s going to be a time violation.

Advertisement

And not like Fergus gave me, I remember this in Vienna, I went absolutely nuts and lost the match because of it, on the tiebreak, where I played like crazy two points with Moutet, I didn’t even go for the towel, something, and he gave me time violation. And this I don’t accept still.

Yeah, I think there is a difference.

The dispute is not new: in 2024 Murphy issued a time violation against Stefanos Tsitsipas at the Rolex Shanghai Masters, prompting Tsitsipas to ask, “Why are you doing this to me, man?” Medvedev won that match in straight sets.

Advertisement

ATP Madrid Open Masters

Madrid quarterfinal preview: Sinner’s streak, Sabalenka’s run and Jodar’s moment

Sinner’s streak, Sabalenka’s run and a rookie’s surge set the stage for Madrid quarterfinal intrigue

Published

on

The Madrid quarterfinals present contrasting storylines across the men’s and women’s draws. On paper, the headline matchup looks straightforward, but each match carries its own shades of risk.

Sinner and Norrie will meet for the first time despite eight years on tour together. Sinner is No. 1 and arrives with 19 straight wins and three consecutive titles. Norrie is No. 23 and 14-9 for the year; his last tournament victory came in 2023. Sinner is described as having the stronger serve, forehand and backhand and is six years younger. Norrie, however, has climbed from the mid-80s in the rankings as of last July, owns five career titles with two on clay and is a stubborn, pesky competitor known for his speed, effort and fist pumps. His craft has troubled top players before, notably Carlos Alcaraz. Against Sinner he will be forced to scramble on return, extend rallies and fight for every point. Winner: Sinner

On the women’s side, Baptiste, 24, has steadily pushed into the higher echelons, reaching a career-high No. 32 and turning big-match opportunities into results. In Miami she beat Svitolina and Ostapenko before losing to Sabalenka in the quarterfinals. In Madrid she has already beaten Paolini and Bencic to reach another quarterfinal against the world No. 1. Their Miami meeting was a 6-4, 6-4 win for Sabalenka. Baptiste possesses an equally heavy serve and forehand, can produce flat backhand winners and may offer superior transition and front-court play. In that previous encounter she was, in the crunch, a touch less confident and a bit more error-prone than Sabalenka. The top seed comes in on a 15-match winning streak. Winner: Sabalenka

This feels like a trap match for Rafael Jodar, a 19-year-old rookie thriving in front of his home crowds after victories over No. 5 seed Alex De Minaur and No. 27 seed Joao Fonseca. A win would likely set up a blockbuster with Sinner. Standing in his way is Vit Kopriva, a 66th-ranked, 28-year-old grinder described as a tennis lifer. At 5’10” and 152 pounds, Kopriva favors clay, likes rallies and creates from the baseline. Earlier this year he reached the semifinals at the 500 in Rio and earlier this week he knocked out 2024 Madrid champion Andrey Rublev.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

ATP Grand Slam Masters

Alcaraz Loses 3,000 Points but Is Secure at No. 2 Through Clay Season

Alcaraz will lose 3,000 ranking points after skipping Rome and Roland Garros yet will keep No. 2 now

Published

on

Carlos Alcaraz confirmed he will miss both the Rome Masters and Roland Garros because of a right wrist injury, tournaments he won last year. By skipping those title defenses he will surrender 3,000 ranking points in total — 1,000 from Rome and 2,000 from Roland Garros — reducing his current total from 12,960 to 9,960 by the end of the clay-court season.

Despite that drop, Alcaraz cannot be overtaken for the No. 2 position through the conclusion of the clay swing. Alexander Zverev, the current No. 3 with 5,255 points, can come closest but would still fall short. If Zverev were to win back-to-back Masters 1000 titles in Madrid and Rome, capture the ATP 500 event in Hamburg the week after (where he is entered) and claim his first Grand Slam at Roland Garros, he would finish the clay-court season with 8,955 points. That projection already factors in the points he is defending during this stretch, including quarterfinal results at Rome and Roland Garros from last year.

At the top of the rankings, Jannik Sinner is assured of retaining No. 1 and has the potential to extend his advantage. Sitting on 13,350 points, Sinner could end the clay-court season anywhere between 11,500 and 15,400 points depending on his results. To land at the lower bound of that range he would need to lose his next match in Madrid and not play Rome or Roland Garros. To reach the upper bound he would need to win Madrid, Rome and Roland Garros.

Alcaraz’s absence reshuffles the mathematical possibilities on clay but does not change the order at the summit of the rankings through the clay-court season. The scenarios leave room for movement below the top two, but the No. 1 and No. 2 positions are locked for the remainder of the clay swing.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

ATP Challenger 175 Challenger Tour

From Challengers to the Top: Early Tour Wins That Shaped Today’s Stars

Challenger victories that launched careers: Alcaraz, Sinner, Bublik, Mensik and Tsitsipas. Exclusive

Published

on

The ATP Challenger circuit remains the proving ground for players who later dominate the main tour. Recent interviews with leading names underline how first Challenger titles provided a foundation of confidence and match experience long before Grand Slam or Masters glory.

Over the past few months, we caught up with some of the most celebrated Champions in men’s tennis and spoke to them about their very first triumphs on the Challenger circuit. For many, that initial title was a defining professional milestone.

Carlos Alcaraz reflected on the pathway explicitly. “It is a step you’ve got to make if you want to get through to the ATP Tour,” Alcaraz tells us. His first Challenger title came in Trieste, Italy in August 2020, a win that preceded his rise to the highest levels of the sport.

Alexander Bublik stressed the extra pressure younger players face. “Pressure will be more than usual on the Challenger Tour, and that’s where a lot of young players break,” says Bublik. His own first Challenger crown was in Morelos, Mexico in February 2017.

Advertisement

Jannik Sinner recalled the immediate lessons of competing above his usual level. “I arrived the night before and I played against a Top 500 player. And I [had] never won against a Top 500 player,” says the now-world No. 1. Sinner took his first Challenger title in Bergamo, Italy in February 2019.

Other recent winners described local significance and survival skills. “We don’t have any ATP Tour events in the Czech republic, so it was the highest tournament category I could win in my home country,” explains Mensik after his Prague triumph in May 2023. “These matches taught me how to survive,” says Tsitsipas, recalling his Genova title from September 2017.

This series highlights how Challenger victories act as both confidence builders and classroom matches. Grigor Dimitrov and Stan Wawrinka are wild-card entrants in this week’s loaded Challenger 175 in Aix-en-Provence, France. Expect further profiles that trace the early titles behind today’s top performers and attention on this week’s Challenger events in Aix-en-Provence and Cagliari.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending